top of page

The Architect’s Technical Supervision in Prior Communication: Ensuring Excellence in the Urban Planning Process

  • Writer: Ana Carolina Santos
    Ana Carolina Santos
  • Nov 18
  • 4 min read

Prior communication represents one of the forms of prior control established under the Legal Framework for Urbanisation and Building (RJUE), constituting a simplified procedure that allows the immediate start of specific urban operations once all legal requirements have been met. This legal instrument provides an efficient means of expediting administrative processes, dispensing with the need for formal permitting acts.

The system is based on the principle of successive supervision, as stated in Article 35  of  the  RJUE, whereby the municipal council retains the power to verify, at a later stage, the compliance of operations with the relevant legal and regulatory provisions. This approach accelerates the process while shifting part of the responsibility for prior verification to the professionals involved.


"Prior communication does not eliminate technical responsibility — it reinforces it, demanding the architect’s rigorous involvement from design to completion."

Architectural project for a single-family house in Loures with approved “Prior Communication”
Architectural project for a single-family house in Loures with approved “Prior Communication”

The architect’s central role in the process


Integrated technical responsibility

In a prior communication procedure, the architect assumes a triple responsibility extending beyond project design to include development and execution. This continuous technical oversight is essential for the success of any urban development operation.

Law No. 40/2015 defines the professional duties of responsible technicians, allowing the architect to:

  • Prepare and sign architectural projects.

  • Coordinate projects across technical disciplines.

  • Direct public or private construction works.

  • Supervise works when signing a responsibility statement is required.


Responsibility statement: a guarantee instrument

This document formalises the architect’s technical commitment, certifying that the project complies with all applicable regulations, including:

  • Current construction standards.

  • Municipal land‑use plans.

  • Compatibility among all specialised designs.

  • Administrative easements and public‑utility restrictions.

The statement is not merely administrative; it represents a binding legal and technical commitment ensuring strict regulatory compliance.



Phases of technical supervision


Preparation and process setup

Supervision begins well before submission. The architect must conduct a thorough assessment by:

  • Confirming the project’s eligibility for the prior communication regime.

  • Coordinating architectural and specialised projects.

  • Promoting and following up on mandatory external consultations.


Submission and technical validation

At submission, the architect ensures all materials are complete:

  • Architectural project and coordinated specialty designs.

  • External entity opinions, if applicable.

  • Documentation regarding contractor and technical direction.

  • Responsibility statements from all professionals.

Attention to detail is crucial, since deficiencies can compromise the procedure or stall construction.


Worksite supervision

During construction, the architect must ensure the work aligns with the approved project and technical standards.

  • Verify compliance regularly and correct deviations.

  • Manage modifications in accordance with Article 83  of  the  RJUE.

  • Coordinate all parties to ensure quality.



The architect’s specific responsibilities


Quality control

The architect is responsible for confirming correct implementation of all design specifications, including:

  • Construction materials and systems.

  • Structural, acoustic, and thermal standards.

  • Safety, health, and accessibility compliance.


Interface with supervisory authorities

The architect collaborates with municipal inspectors by:

  • Maintaining updated technical documentation.

  • Responding promptly to official inquiries.

  • Reporting any changes that may affect project compliance.


Managing non‑conformities

When issues arise, the architect must:

  • Identify the nature of the discrepancy.

  • Propose corrective technical solutions.

  • Oversee their implementation and confirm resolution.



Control and verification instruments


Supervision planning

A structured plan defining key verification points, periodic visits, and methods for systematic tracking is essential to prevent future issues.


Documentation

Maintain detailed records, including:

  • Site visit reports.

  • Photographic records.

  • Technical communications with the contractor or client.

  • Proof of corrective measures when applicable.



Coordination with other stakeholders


Technical specialists

As coordinator, the architect must ensure interdisciplinary coherence, resolve structural or system conflicts, and maintain clear communication on design updates.


Construction management

Collaboration with the site manager focuses on:

  • Sharing technical data.

  • Jointly solving technical challenges.

  • Validating alternative solutions when appropriate.


Client communication

The architect must keep the client informed of progress and relevant technical or legal matters through reports, alerts, and recommendations.



Legal and regulatory framework


Law No. 40/2015 obliges responsible technicians to monitor construction when necessary to guarantee compliance. Failure to do so may lead to:

  • Civil liability for damages.

  • Disciplinary actions before the Order of Architects.

  • Professional reputational consequences.


Supervision must also ensure compliance with:


Interior view of single-family house in Loures with approved “Prior Communication”
Interior view of single-family house in Loures with approved “Prior Communication”

Technological innovations in supervision


Digital monitoring tools

Modern technologies enhance supervision through:

  • Mobile apps for inspections and non‑conformities.

  • Digital document management systems.

  • Collaborative online platforms linking project teams.

  • BIM tools for dimensional and constructive control.


BIM methodology in prior communication

The RJUE already permits BIM format submissions, enabling:

  • Automated geometric compliance checks.

  • 4D modelling for forecasting issues.

  • Centralised information management.



Special cases


Historic areas

Supervision in heritage zones requires ensuring compliance with cultural restrictions, compatibility of modern systems, and coordination with restoration specialists.


Innovative or modular construction

These methods demand reinforced supervision, precise documentation, material testing, and post‑assembly compliance checks under the RGEU.



Key takeaway


Technical supervision by the architect in prior communication procedures is crucial to ensuring quality, safety, and legal compliance throughout the construction process. This responsibility extends beyond design to active and methodical participation at all stages. The architect’s ability to integrate technical, legal, and operational dimensions is vital to maintaining the integrity of urban processes. Although prior communication simplifies procedures, it demands unwavering technical accuracy and competence.


  • Instagram - Black Circle
  • Pinterest
  • Whatsapp
  • Linkedin icon

AC Arquitetos 

Copyright © 2019 | All rights reserved

bottom of page